<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BernardBraylaw.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DUI Checkpoints, A Potential Gold Mine For Cash Strapped Local Governments?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/dui-checkpoints-a-potential-gold-mine-for-cash-strapped-local-governments</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/dui-checkpoints-a-potential-gold-mine-for-cash-strapped-local-governments#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interestingly, more cars were seized from unlicensed California drivers in 2009 at DUI checkpoints, than suspected drunken drivers that were arrested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUI checkpoints are a direct method of clearing our roads of drunken drivers, but they are also providing a much needed unintended source of cash for local governments.  Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 14602.6 Police Officers may on the spot seize cars driven by unlicensed motorists, and subject them to a 30 day impoundment.  Interestingly, more cars were seized from unlicensed California drivers in 2009 at DUI checkpoints, than suspected drunken drivers that were arrested.</p>
<p>An Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California Berkeley recently reported that California DUI check points generated an estimated $40 million in towing costs and administrative fees from seizing cars from unlicensed drivers in 2009, money that was shared by local governments and towing firms.</p>
<p>The law provides that responsibility for paying storage, towing and administrative charges is the responsibility of all registered owners of the cars that are seized as the result of having been driven by unlicensed drivers.  The administrative charges assessed by local governments significantly run up the bill.  And, all Cities, Counties, and the State, are all entitled to access these fees pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22850.5.</p>
<p>Currently sobriety checkpoints that the California Highway Patrol operates do not result in administrative fees being accessed on seized vehicles that are driven by unlicensed drivers, but it appears only to be a matter of time before the State of California gets on board, and edges in on the extra income generating scheme.</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding California DUI sobriety check points, or should you or a loved have had the misfortune of a DUI arrest, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, call <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyer" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/dui-checkpoints-a-potential-gold-mine-for-cash-strapped-local-governments/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oldest Profession Alive and Well in San Jose?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/the-oldest-profession-alive-and-well-in-san-jose</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/the-oldest-profession-alive-and-well-in-san-jose#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oldest Profession Alive and Well in San Jose?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who has ever perused a copy of the San Jose Metro, or who has ever visited extremely popular SFREDBOOK.COM already knows, the world&#8217;s oldest profession is apparently very alive and well in San Jose and Santa Clara County.</p>
<p>Prostitution is an agreement between consenting people to provide sexual activity in exchange for money. The crime requires activity toward accomplishing the agreement. The activity can be any step taken toward a sexual act. Whether sex actually occurs or not, is not essential to establish the crime.</p>
<p>All communities in the south bay area of San Francisco take prostitution crimes very seriously. And, prostitution charges are vigorously prosecuted in Santa Clara County. The San Jose Police Department, Sunnyvale Police Department, and many other Police Departments in Santa Clara County even have specialized units of experienced police officers focused solely on eradicating prostitution.</p>
<p>Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean immigrants, in particular, are oftentimes the target of prostitution investigations in Santa Clara County, and as immigrants, they face potentially serous immigration consequences upon conviction for prostitution.</p>
<p>San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer Bernard P. Bray has given special attention to  prostitution cases for over 20 years. Attorney Bernard P. Bray has been successful in asserting defenses based on many theories, including double jeopardy and outrageous police misconduct in attacking prostitution charges on technical grounds, and has an excellent track record with prostitution cases in front of juries.</p>
<p>Prostitution allegations should not be taken lightly. When faced with a prostitution case call <a title="San Jose Criminal Attorney" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com">San Jose Criminal Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray at: (408) 292-9700. Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean interpreters are available on request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/the-oldest-profession-alive-and-well-in-san-jose/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can It Be the Economy?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/can-it-be-the-economy</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/can-it-be-the-economy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistics for domestic violence related deaths in Santa Clara County for 2009 are in, and they are staggering.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistics for domestic violence related deaths in Santa Clara County for 2009 are in, and they are staggering.  Notwithstanding heightened community attention, and a vast public expenditure of resources in domestic violence prevention efforts for many years now, there were eleven domestic violence related deaths in Santa Clara County in 2009, more than a threefold increase over 2008.</p>
<p>Some have opined that it’s the economy.  Unquestionably, the economic stress associated with the recession has pushed some families to the economic brink, but is that the reason for the increase in deaths?  Perhaps it is the economy, or just a coincidence, or it might be time to take a hard look at how we as a community are utilizing our public resources in domestic violence prevention efforts.</p>
<p>Domestic violence is a serious social problem with awful consequences for everyone.  Should you have questions regarding domestic violence please call San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer Bernard P. Bray at (408) 292-9700.  <a title="San Jose Domestic Violence Lawyer" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic_violence.htm">San Jose Domestic Violence Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray has many years of experience dealing with domestic violence issues, and assisting clients and their families in minimizing the impact of an arrest for a domestic violence related offense of a family member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/can-it-be-the-economy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010: The Year of the Drunk Driving Checkpoint?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/2010-the-year-of-the-drunk-driving-checkpoint</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/2010-the-year-of-the-drunk-driving-checkpoint#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Office of Traffic Safety has recently announced that 2010 will be the Year of the Drunk DrivingCheckpoint in California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out all would be drivers after consuming alcohol and driving in California.  The California Office of Traffic Safety has recently announced that 2010 will be the Year of the DUI Checkpoint in California.  California already conducts more DUI check points that any other state in the country, and 2010 will see an increase in those checkpoints.</p>
<p>$8,000,000.00 has been allocated by the California Office of Traffic Safety, and it is estimated that this money will fund approximately 2500 DUI checkpoints in 2010, a significant increase over 2009’s approximately 1700 sobriety checkpoints.</p>
<p>A driving under the influence arrest can bring serious consequences in California, including: license suspension, a mandatory jail sentence, probation, stiff fines, court fees, long term alcohol classes, increased insurance premiums, and a criminal record.  The above are all potential standard consequences of a first driving under the influence conviction.  Attorney Bernard P. Bray has extensive experience and an excellent track record of successful results defending drunk driving cases.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one has been arrested for drunk driving contact <a title="San Jose DUI Attorney" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose DUI Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray immediately: <strong>(408) 292-9700. </strong>One must move quickly in securing assistance. An accused only has 10 days in which to request a hearing with the DMV to avoid what otherwise will be an automatic license suspension for an arrestee who produced a .08% or higher blood alcohol test result, or who refused a blood alcohol test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/2010-the-year-of-the-drunk-driving-checkpoint/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Break For DUI Drivers?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/a-break-for-dui-drivers-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/a-break-for-dui-drivers-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second and third time DUI drivers in California have for several years been subjected to long term license suspension as a result of their convictions.  Effective this year the rules for obtaining restricted licenses for second and third time California DUI drivers are changing, and providing quite a break.
Now, second time DUI, alcohol only, offenders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second and third time DUI drivers in California have for several years been subjected to long term license suspension as a result of their convictions.  Effective this year the rules for obtaining restricted licenses for second and third time California DUI drivers are changing, and providing quite a break.</p>
<p>Now, second time DUI, alcohol only, offenders will be able to apply for a restricted license after ninety days into their otherwise two year license suspension.  Previously, they could only apply after twelve months into their two year suspension.  Third time DUI, alcohol only, offenders will now be able to apply for a restricted license after six months into their three year license suspension.  Previously, they could only apply for a restricted license after twelve months into their three year suspension.</p>
<p>The legislative history surrounding these changes state that their purpose is to encourage drunk drivers to obtain ignition interlock devices by permitting them to obtain restricted licenses sooner if they do.</p>
<p>Should you or a loved one have the misfortune of a DUI arrest and/or have questions concerning California DUI laws contact <a title="San Jose DUI lawyer" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com">San Jose DUI lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/a-break-for-dui-drivers-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accused of Domestic Violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/accused-of-domestic-violence</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/accused-of-domestic-violence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you or a loved one have been arrested for Domestic Violence, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact San Jose Criminal Defense Attorney Bernard P. Bray and learn your options before you go to court.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domestic Violence arrests are on the increase.  As any experienced police officer knows, the holidays bring a rise in family violence calls.  And, California law encourages an arrest of all suspected Domestic Violence offenders, and requires an arrest if probable cause exists to support an arrest.</p>
<p>Domestic Violence has the highest repeat rate of any crime.  Many victims, although willing to make a report of Domestic Violence, legitimately or otherwise, in a rage of anger, refuse to give evidence against a partner in a criminal prosecution.</p>
<p align="left">Conviction for a Domestic Violence or a Domestic Violence related offense can have very serious consequences for even the first time offender including jail time, long term formal probation, long term anger management counseling, a presumption against custody in Family Court child custody proceedings, a criminal record, and other consequences. In order to minimize the consequences of a Domestic Violence arrest contact Bernard P. Bray (408) 292-9700.</p>
<p>Once filed, Domestic Violence cases are aggressively prosecuted in California and you should only be represented by an experienced attorney prepared to fight your case.  I have 26 years of experience handling Domestic Violence cases.  They are difficult cases oftentimes presenting many complex issues.  However, there is a lot that an attorney can do for a client and their family brought into court facing a Domestic Violence case.</p>
<p>Domestic Violence and Domestic Violence related charges can result from even the simple use of any type of force on the person of a spouse, significant other, child, or one with whom an accused has been involved in a dating relationship.  If you or a loved one have been arrested for Domestic Violence, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact <a href="http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/wp-admin/San%20Jose%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorney">San Jose Criminal Defense Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray and learn your options before you go to court.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/accused-of-domestic-violence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I need a Lawyer At My First Court Appearance?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/do-i-need-a-lawyer-at-my-first-court-appearance</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/do-i-need-a-lawyer-at-my-first-court-appearance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not unusual for persons still in denial following an arrest to proceed to court alone under the mistaken impression that they do not need a lawyer at their first court appearance, or that they can handle it themselves.  They could not be more mistaken.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not unusual for persons still in denial following an arrest to proceed to court alone under the mistaken impression that they do not need a lawyer at their first court appearance, or that they can handle it themselves.  They could not be more mistaken.  Unaware of potential legal consequences and pitfalls, it is a 50-50 proposition, that appearing at a first court appearance in a criminal case without a lawyer is going to result in a bad decision, and that same may ultimately have an impact on the outcome of a case.</p>
<p>A first court appearance on a criminal charge is what is known as an arraignment.  At the time of an arraignment one accused of a crime is provided with notice of the charges, notice of their constitutional rights, and is usually expected to immediately make certain decisions as to how some logistical matters will be handled, such as if they intend to assert their right to a speedy trial, enter a plea or defer same, or make any special requests, such as a bail reduction or a release on their own recognizance.</p>
<p>The situation is extremely stressful, in particular for an in custody arrestee, and arrestees not represented by a lawyer.  People oftentimes go into court thinking they are going to be given the opportunity to explain what brought them to their current circumstances, only getting, at most, a brief one sided dialogue with a Judge, and then its over.  In Santa Clara County in custody arrestees on misdemeanor cases are often brought before a Superior Court Judge and offered the opportunity right at the gate, to plead guilty, and get out of jail.  Under such circumstances even factually innocent people, faced with the prospect of job loss, home loss, the further hardship to family members that incarceration entails, sometimes jump at the chance to immediately plead guilty, and get out of the horror of jail, not even realizing that they perhaps would have otherwise been entitled to a bail reduction or own recognizance release, that would have given them the opportunity to get out of jail pending trial, and adequately prepare an appropriate defense.</p>
<p>One has the right to be represented by an attorney at their arraignment in court, and one is best advised to take advantage of that right.  Everyone should agree that if you have been seriously injured in an accident, one is ill advised to refuse the ambulance ride to the hospital.  Similarly, if one is faced with something as potentially life compromising as the consequences of a criminal charge one should seek out the professional help of an experienced criminal defense lawyer.  The San Jose Mercury News recently reported that in a recent study of 246 random resisting arrest cases in Santa Clara County, at least 47% of the persons represented by an attorney were able to avoid conviction on the charged offense, as opposed to 10% of those without an attorney.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been arrested, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact <a href="http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/wp-admin/San%20Jose%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorney">San Jose Criminal Defense Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray and learn your options before you go to court.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/do-i-need-a-lawyer-at-my-first-court-appearance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do Criminal Histories Impact Employment Opportunities?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/how-do-criminal-histories-impact-employment-opportunities</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/how-do-criminal-histories-impact-employment-opportunities#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California law allows employers to inquire of potential employees their criminal histories that have resulted in conviction, or of pending charges for which a potential employee is out on bail or his own recognizance pending trial.
Inquires about arrests and detentions, that did not result in conviction, are prohibited, including convictions for certain marijuana related offenses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California law allows employers to inquire of potential employees their criminal histories that have resulted in conviction, or of pending charges for which a potential employee is out on bail or his own recognizance pending trial.</p>
<p>Inquires about arrests and detentions, that did not result in conviction, are prohibited, including convictions for certain marijuana related offenses more than two years old, inquiries about convictions that have been expunged, sealed, or eradicated, and inquires about certain misdemeanor convictions for which probation has been completed, or otherwise discharged, and the case dismissed.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding these laws affording employment seekers some protection from the disclosure of improper arrests, I am often contacted by persons complaining about lost employment opportunities because an employer has become aware of an otherwise, not subject not to disclosure, arrest that was dismissed or for which they successfully completed a diversion program, or for which they obtained an expungement after successfully completing probation.</p>
<p>While the law provides damages for an arrest background inquiry that results in actual damages, or a nominal recovery for such a violation, the costs involved in pursuing same may be prohibitive.</p>
<p>The problem with arrest histories is that they are publicly accessible and often times end up in court files that are also publicly accessible, notwithstanding the ultimate outcome in any particular case.  This information will get picked up in even the simplest of background checks.</p>
<p>The only meaningful way to protect oneself from the potentially catastrophic lifelong untoward consequences of an arrest is to vigorously defend oneself from the outset.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one has been arrested, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact <a title="San Jose Criminal Defense Attorney" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com">San Jose Criminal Defense Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray and learn your options.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/how-do-criminal-histories-impact-employment-opportunities/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Schwarzenegger’s Wife a Scoff law?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/governor-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-wife-a-scoff-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/governor-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-wife-a-scoff-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity and entertainment website TMZ.com recently posted pictures depicting California’s First Lady Maria Shriver twice breaking California’s law against using a hand held cell phone while driving.
Marie Shriver’s husband Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed off in 2008 on the law that requires all California drivers to use hands free mobile phones while driving.
The law is one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity and entertainment website TMZ.com recently posted pictures depicting California’s First Lady Maria Shriver twice breaking California’s law against using a hand held cell phone while driving.</p>
<p>Marie Shriver’s husband Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed off in 2008 on the law that requires all California drivers to use hands free mobile phones while driving.</p>
<p>The law is one that many, not just Governor Schwarzenegger’s wife, have more honored in the breach than in the observance.  Is a law that is more often broken than observed really a good law at all?  California drivers can do just about anything else possible, and legally, while driving.</p>
<p>There does not appear to be a ground swell for support for changing the law prohibiting cell phone use while driving.  Governor Schwarzenegger promised swift action in response to his wife’s law violations, and the California First lady has apologized.</p>
<p>If you or someone you know has questions regarding criminal justice issues please contact <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyer" href="http://bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/governor-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-wife-a-scoff-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough of Zero Tolerance Yet Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/enough-of-zero-tolerance-yet-again</link>
		<comments>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/enough-of-zero-tolerance-yet-again#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b.bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Tolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough of zero tolerance yet?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six year old first grader Zachary Christie was recently suspended  from Downes Elementary School in Newark Delaware for bringing a camping eating utensil to school.  He was initially faced with the prospect of a 45 day commitment to reform school for his transgression.</p>
<p>In previous blog entries I addressed the Milpitas California High School Official’s decision to bar from high school graduation ceremonies a student who had broken up an on school campus fight in the name of maintaining the integrity of the school district’s zero tolerance policy on campus violence, and the United States Supreme Court’s decision of early this year in Safford School District v. Redding, where the court deemed unreasonable a strip search of a 13 year old girl alleged to have been in possession of ibuprofen.</p>
<p>Enough of zero tolerance yet?  The Newark Delaware School District Board voted to amend the district’s zero tolerance policy allowing for a less draconian punishment for Zachary of three to five days of suspension, rather than the initially indicated reform school commitment.  To accommodate Zachary the amendment to the policy was made retroactive to the beginning of the school year.</p>
<p>Are schools really moving forward?   Is this a signal of the beginning of the end of zero judgment, zero tolerance for school culture in the United States?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you or someone you know has questions regarding criminal justice issues and youth please contact the <a title="San Jose Juvenile Lawyers" href="http://bernardbraylaw.com/">San Jose Juvenile Lawyers</a> at the Law Offices of Bernard P. Bray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/enough-of-zero-tolerance-yet-again/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
